![]() |
| Not me, fyi |
I agree with Locke when he says that inequality doesn't exist before money is brought into the equation. It is the basis on which we form our society and its structure. For many, it is how they determine where to live, raise families, and who to associate themselves with. Money separates us and connects us all at the same time. This may be a cynical way of looking at our capitalistic and materialistic way of life, however I see it as just realistic.
How else would we be able to claim rights to things? History has shown that utopic communities where everything is everyone's just doesn't work. In the movie Wanderlust with Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston, the plot pokes fun at the idea of people living together in a commune and the abandonment of conformity and society. In the end (sorry if I'm spoiling it for you, it's not that hard to predict) modern living prevails for Paul and Jennifer's characters.
As much as I wish we could abandon all sense of conformity and structure and live without the constraints of money, I don't see another way our world could operate. We, as humans, have been placing value on objects throughout history. It's how we prioritize the necessities and luxuries of life, i.e. food and shelter vs that new iPhone or unnecessary pair of shoes.
Multimedia Sources: Kid with Cash, Wanderlust
